How I Got Banned On Facebook

Many of you, like myself, are probably fans of the EMT/Paramedic Community Page on Facebook. Well here’s the cautionary story of how I got banned from commenting and liking anything there, or perhaps more importantly, how with great power comes a greater responsibility to more than just those that might agree with you when representing the industry in the eyes of the public.

The Offending Post

So Friday night I caught this post from the EMT/Paramedic Community Page in my stream. I was honestly a bit taken back by it, having not seen this type of attitude from the Page Administrator before. Both the tone and the content of that status update are things that I have advocated against, repeatedly, again, and again, and again. It is important to be professional online especially when in a public forum like Facebook.

Reading the comments I saw some typical misguided comments about the subject of HIPAA, some additional misguided comments about the nature of the Facebook Page, and an expected groundswell of support for the page. Allow me to make something very clear to hopefully correct some of that: a Facebook Page is a PUBLIC PRESENCE that ANYONE on Facebook can see. It is not “owned” by an individual, it is not limited to viewing by a select group, it is NOT an “EMS site”.

Not agreeing with either the tone of the post or the comments, I left my own comment to try and redirect this unnecessary unprofessional vitirol against another users opinion, as misguided as it may have been. It read:

I don’t know what’s worse, someone misunderstanding legal matters, like most in EMS, or a Facebook Page Administrator who calls a user a “moron” instead of using the opportunity to provide some education. Something to ponder…

About two hours later I went back to see how the conversation was progressing. Do you know what I found? Somehow I had mysteriously “unliked” the page, which I promptly re-”liked”. Once I did that I was able to see the wall again and the comments. That was when I discovered what had REALLY happened.

My comment had been deleted.

I could not make a comment.

I had been banned.

BANNED!

In a recent interview with EMS World, the Page Administrator Kenya Nixon had the following to say:

Of course, there is a downside to being the administrator of a popular, public page. “Dealing with spam and trolls is a big negative,” Nixon says. “I like everything to stay civil, but that doesn’t always happen.”

I can understand the need to keep the SPAM and the trolls to a minimum. As a Page Administrator I too have had to remove comments and on occasion ban a user or two for the use of profanity, an uncivil nature, and unprofessional comments.

So did my comment fall into the uncivil and unprofessional category? I don’t think so. Perhaps you think differently and, unlike the Page Administrator, I welcome your opinion… as long as it is provided in a professional and respectful manner (as a quick note, I do have comment moderation enabled so it may take a little bit for your comment to be visible).

The problem here, or at least my perception of the problem, is the Page Administrator did not like a dissenting critical opinion of their word choice. They viewed it as an attack instead of what I had intended, something meant to provoke a pause, initiate thought, and hopefully lead the Administrator to the conclusion that what they had indeed posted was unprofessional and something they should correct. In essence, they chose to censor me.

It’s important to understand that I remain a big believer in you own your own words from my WELL days and that yes, mistakes both can and will happen. Recognize the mistake, correct it, and remember it so that you don’t make it again.

Years ago the vast majority of EMS blogs were filled with unprofessional content, rant style, insulting, and some downright obscene things. Over the last few years that’s changed dramatically thanks to the efforts of the true professionals in this field to provide a more positive image of the profession to the point where the rant style has become non-typical of the field. It seems that now we have to worry about the Facebook Page Administrators smearing us as well. Is there education available about it? Absolutely. The very basics that I previously linked to can be applied to ANY social network/social media setting.

In the end it’s not about specific content, it’s about the basic elements of decency, compassion, and trying to effect a positive change in the lives of others. Looking at what that Facebook Page Administrator has done by both their posting and their action of banning me from further comments, I have to wonder what their patient care is like.

If their lack of those three tenets is any indicator, then I hope they choose a new profession soon.

So What Was The Post Directed At?

The post on Facebook that I commented on was in reference to a photo that had appeared on the Facebook Page’s wall. The photo was an EMT or Paramedic kneeling down to remove an object that had impaled a patient through the posterior. There was some mild nudity and the patient’s face was not visible.

To that extent, also from the interview on EMS World came this statement from Page Administrator Kenya Nixon:

Thankfully, Facebook has strict rules regarding what it deems “obscene,” so it’s easier for her to discourage things like pictures of extreme injuries. “I also don’t allow any solicitations without the vendor first contacting me,” she says. “I don’t want the site to turn into one giant ad.”

Due to the graphic nature of the photo I consider it Not Safe For Work or children and therefore, unlike the public Facebook Page, you’ll have to click here to see it and read the rest of the post…


Pages: 1 2

Because It’s About Best Practices

I received an interesting e-mail regarding my post on What We Can Learn From Hibachi Cooking. Here’s the snippet I found most interesting:

…you continue to make these crazy comparisons as if one is related to the other. This not only has nothing to do with social media but nothing to do with EMS. EMS is unique with unique challenges and unique solutions…
-Name withheld for their own protection

It’s absolutely true that I often make comparisons in both Social Media and EMS to things not necessarily correlated either directly or indirectly. While part of this is because I’m not a big fan of reinventing the wheel, the other part is because I think that everything (and everyone) has value. It’s just a matter of observation to determine how that value can be applied to our own challenges. This is usually referred to as discovering “best practices” to meet a need.

Here’s another great example of putting “best practices” to use:

“Pit crews” are a car racing tradition and the answer to a quick response for a problem. By training “pit crew” style we decrease the time between patient contact and the start of effective compressions with early defibrillator application maximizing the potential for a ROSC. So we’ve taken a racing “best practice”, applied the ideology to a challenge in EMS, and from most accounts have achieved a better response time.

While I will readily admit that at times my comparisons may be a stretch, it’s important that we keep both our eyes and our minds open to the possibilities of what can ultimately improve our service as whole. Sure, there are some industry “best practices” that won’t necessarily work for some systems because of other variables, but ultimately we won’t actually know what works best until we try it.

So as far as the Hibachi post goes, when it comes to the distribution of your social media content, give it a try for a week or two and compare the results to what you had done previously. You won’t know if you’ll get a greater reach unless you are willing to try it out. If you do, feel free to let me know what worked and what didn’t work.

My inquiring mind wants to know…


Miami-Dade County Investigation of Captain’s Facebook Post Treads Fine Line Of Violating Privacy

There is an interesting story over at EMS World about Miami-Dade County investigating a Facebook posting made by one of their captains regarding the Treyvon Martin shooting. The article is originally from The Miami Herald and reads in part with my own added emphasis:

Capt. Brian Beckmann’s post, published for the public Friday by the website theGrio.com, lambasts the prosecutor in the George Zimmerman case and suggests “urban youth” are the products of “failed, sh*tbag, ignorant, pathetic, welfare dependent excuses for parents.”

Someone with access to Beckmann’s Facebook page sent a screen shot of his posting to the website which is geared toward African-American issues.
-Miami-Dade firefighter under investigation for Trayvon Martin Facebook rant, The Miami Herald 4/15/12

Facebook: Who needs enemies with friends like these?The article states the post was published for the public Friday by the website theGrio.com, indicating that Captain Beckmann’s post was NOT a public posting. This is not the same as the old “could you say it in a restaurant” sniff test that Happy is fond of, this is more of a “could you say it in your living room with friends” type of situation.

The article further states that someone with access to Beckmann’s Facebook page sent a screen shot of his posting to the website, indicating that no one from the website was able to see the posting themselves. In all likelihood, his privacy settings were set to share only with his “Friends“.

I am interested to learn the findings of this investigation. It may very well be that they are looking to see when he posted it, because if he was on duty when he did so he may have very well violated a policy. If the investigation is more about the content than the time, well then that is treading a very fine line in violating his privacy, especially since it was not something he made public himself.

Although there’s no proof, it is yet another great reason why you should NOT accept requests from Facebook Profiles of agencies or organizations. Agencies and organizations should have a Facebook Page.


EMT Ranked First In Jobs Thought To Pay More Than They Actually Do

Last week Yahoo! published 8 Careers That Pay Less Than You Think and listed EMT as the first job thought to pay more than the average $27,000 a year. From their article:

You trust these professionals with your life. They’re the people who step in to help those who are sick, injured or in danger, at times even placing themselves in precarious situations in the process. However, you might be surprised to learn that emergency medical technicians (or EMTs) aren’t earning the big bucks. According to the Bureau of Labor and Statistics, the average income for this occupation is only about $27,000 per year. Considering that this position requires workers to obtain post-secondary education, be on call, work shift work and deal with a huge amount of stress, this wage seems incredibly low.
- Yahoo! 8 Careers That Pay Less Than You Think

I can understand why the public thinks EMTs and Paramedics make more than they actually do. This would also explain all the venomous comments on the news sites that take great pleasure deriding the profession when something goes awry. Then again, if we paid more, would those people even be in the profession anymore?

Of course, what they fail to mention is that the biggest payor for the Emergency Medical Services is tax payer funded. As the Supreme Court contemplates the constitutionality of mandated health insurance, the private insurances follow Medicare and Medicaid who continue to reduce reimbursements while our costs are on the rise. How are our agencies expected to increase the pay of the professionals with reduced budgets, reduced revenue, and increased costs without going out of business themselves?

The banks were once deemed “too big to fail”. Maybe its time we communicated that EMS was “too important to fail”. How do we do that?

Using social media is a good place to start


Don’t Tie It, Clamp It

I caught this originally over on Gizmodo.

It’s an interesting concept for controlling bleeding that would normally be controlled by a tourniquet. One of the claims in the original article is that it can be applied faster and better control the bleeding. Check out the video and see if you wondered the same thing that I did:

The application of the device appears to potentially create additional penetration to the skin that may, or may not, be able to hold up to the pressure. While this may be convenient in the cases of some wounds (such as the illustrated handgun), probably not so much in others.

Like a shark bite.

Interesting concept, but I don’t see the benefit especially at the price point of $65 they’re pitching for what looks like a one time use.

What do you think?