EMS Week 2012 is finally over. Honestly, I for one am very grateful that the hectic flurry of events and chaos is done. Not surprisingly, I missed the NYC REMSCO Annual Dinner. At the event they played this video:
Yeah… I dunno. Besides seeing at least three ambulances in the slideshow that no longer physically exist (so those are some pretty dated photos)… again I’m not sure if this is the type of message we need to be sending.
It seems to reinforce the whole “Dark Side” tone from this year. Should we be portraying ourselves like the bad asses from Sons of Anarchy if we want to growing geriatric population to call us? I would think not, but yet here we are doing it yet again. Even worse, the “saved by the Governor in the 11th hour” REMSCO is doing it which makes me seriously wonder if they learned anything about perception during their near death experience.
Then again, maybe it’s because I’m getting old myself and this kind of juvenile “playing soldier” message doesn’t sit well with me anymore.
Or maybe I’m just ticked that once again, I didn’t get a freaking t-shirt.
You can decide for yourself.

For those of you who have been waiting this year’s video from hip hop artist/paramedic Farooq Muhammad of the FDNY, you have to wait no longer!

A screen shot of the Facebook page was sent to Miami-Dade Fire Rescue’s human resources department on April 12, according to county records released Monday. A day later, it was published on the website theGrio.com, an African-American news website.
I am an ardent advocate for EMS agencies to become involved in Social Media. While I consider myself more of an evangelist than an expert (because I really hate the term “Social Media Expert”), it is important that agencies do so responsibly. There are three major things required of an agency to do so:
So Friday night I caught this post from the EMT/Paramedic Community Page in my stream. I was honestly a bit taken back by it, having not seen this type of attitude from the Page Administrator before. Both the tone and the content of that status update are things that I have advocated against, 
The problem here, or at least my perception of the problem, is the Page Administrator did not like a dissenting critical opinion of their word choice. They viewed it as an attack instead of what I had intended, something meant to provoke a pause, initiate thought, and hopefully lead the Administrator to the conclusion that what they had indeed posted was unprofessional and something they should correct. In essence, they chose to censor me.




